Upgrade.Vet

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01104

Original file (PD2013 01104.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1301104
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20140218

SEPARATION DATE: 20020718

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-6 (97E/Interrogator) medically separated for chronic chest wall and abdominal pain. The CI performed sit-ups after duty hours while at a temporary duty location in 1996, when he experienced a sharp left-sided chest pain lasting for approximately 20 minutes. During this time he was unable to move or breathe deeply. The pain resolved and he sought no medical care. During the course of two permanent duty station changes, which affected follow-up on treatment plans, the pain recurred and became more frequent and severe. The CI received multiple orthopedic evaluations and conservative treatment included steroid injections and physical therapy. By 2001, the chest wall and abdominal pain condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The conditions, characterized as “costochondritis”, “aponeurotic neuritis”, and “diastasis of abdominal rectus,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the rib cage and upper abdominal condition as unfitting, rated 0%. The CI made no appeal and was medically separated.

CI CONTENTION: The CI attached a 4-page statement to his application which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting rib cage and upper abdominal condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20020404	VA - (6 Mos. Pre -Separation)
Condition	Code	Rating	Condition	Code	Rating	Exam
Pain of Rib Cage and Upper Abdomen, of Uncertain Etiology, variously diagnosed as Costochondritis, Aponeurotic Neuritis, Diastasis of Abdominal Rectus, which limits physical vigor.	5099 5003	0%	Costochondritis	5399-5319	10%	20020128
			Diastasis of Rectus Abdominis Rectus, with Aponeurotic Neuritis	5319	0%	20020128
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries	Other x 9	20020128
Combined: 0%	Combined: 20%

Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 20923 .

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The PEB combined the costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis and diastasis of abdominis rectus conditions under a single disability rating, coded analogously to 5003. Although VASRD §4.71a permits combined ratings of two or more joints under 5003, it allows separate ratings for separately compensable joints. IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must follow suit if the PEB combined adjudication is not compliant with the latter stipulation, provided that each “unbundled” condition can be reasonably justified as separately unfitting in order to remain eligible for rating. If the members judge that separately ratable conditions are justified by performance based fitness criteria and indicated IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), separate ratings are recommended; with the stipulation that the result may not be lower than the overall combined rating from the PEB. The Board’s initial charge in this case was therefore directed at determining if the PEB’s combined adjudication was justified in lieu of separate ratings.

Pain of Rib Cage (costochondritis) and Upper Abdomen (aponeurotic neuritis/ diastasis of rectus abdominis). The CI reported that his first episode of left chest pain begun in 1996. An acute care note dated 30 August 1996 documented that the CI sustained a fall while playing sports. The records were silent for chest pain until 5 August 1998 when the CI reported recurrence of his left chest pain with abdominal exercises. The examination revealed tenderness to palpation at left 9th rib. The CI was treated with conservative therapy, nerve block and steroid injection without relief. At a pain management evaluation on 2 September 1999, the examiner noted a large diastasis between his the upper rectus abdominis muscles and recreation of his pain with deep palpation on the aponeurotic portion of the upper area of the left rectus abdominis. The CI was permanently profiled and continued on conservative management and physical therapy. Radiographic and cardiac evaluations were normal. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed 6 months prior to separation the CI reported that twice a month he would have left chest pain that would result in cessation of the activity for about 15 minutes. The use of pain medications reduced the frequency of the left chest pain. The CI also reported episodic abdominal pain which responded to activity cessation. The physical examination revealed significant anterior (front) chest tenderness to palpation. The narrative summary 4 months prior to separation noted a history of left chest pain dating to 1996. After multiple orthopedic consultation and persistent pain despite conservative management, the CI was diagnosed with chronic thoracic costochondritis and diastasis of the rectus abdominis. The CI reported sharp, intense left chest flare-ups lasting 15-20 minutes. The flare-ups occurred 2-3 times per week with minimal pain in between exacerbations. Activity modification, rest and antiinflammatory medications relieved the pain.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the pain of the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis, and diastasis of abdominal rectus) conditions under a single service disability rating for “overall effect” as permitted by DoDI 1332.38 (E3.P3.4.4). This approach by the PEB reflects its judgment that the constellation of conditions was unfitting, but that each condition was not individually unfitting. Since this is an intrinsic service prerogative outside the scope of the VASRD, the Board does not recommend separate codes and ratings in this circumstance unless members agree that one or more conditions were separately unfitting independently of overall effect. In support of a recommendation for two or more separate service ratings derived from a PEB overall effect adjudication; members must be satisfied, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that each condition recommended for separate rating would have independently resulted in MEB referral and a PEB finding that the member was unfit due to physical disability. The Board’s initial charge in this case was therefore directed at determining if the PEB’s single overall effect rating was justified in lieu of separate unfit determinations and ratings.

The preponderance of the treatment notes were directed toward treatment of his rib pain (costochondritis). The rib pain was documented as greater than the abdominal pain (diastasis of the rectus abdominis). Both conditions were profiled for pain which limited physical vigor. The overall pain associated with both conditions was implicated in the commander’s statement. Board members agreed that the overall pain of the rib cage and upper abdomen and the lack of response to multiple pain management modalities contributed to the CI’s inability to perform physical tasks related to military service. The Board determined that it was speculative to separate the functional impact of the rib pain from that of the abdominal pain and that either would not have rendered the CI incapable of performing his MOS within his rating; but, that it was also reasonable to surmise that it was the overall effect of both the pain of the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis and diastasis of abdominal rectus) which rendered him unfit. Members agreed, therefore, that the pain of the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis and diastasis of abdominal rectus) conditions were not reasonably justified as separately unfitting; and, accordingly, they cannot be recommended for separate disability rating. Members agreed that the pain of the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis, and diastasis of abdominal rectus) condition met the VASRD criteria for application of §4.40, functional loss as demonstrated by the inability to perform physical tasks related to military service. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis and diastasis of abdominal rectus) pain condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis and diastasis of abdominal rectus) condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION	VASRD CODE	RATING
Pain of Rib Cage and Upper Abdomen	5099-5003	10%
COMBINED	10%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130809, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20140012279 (PD201301104)

1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00157

Original file (PD 2014 00157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Rating the condition as “moderate” would result in a 10% rating, no different from the ratings posted by the PEB and VA, so the Board considered whether the condition could be rated as “moderately severe” at 20%. During the 5 years prior to separation, the CI noted increasing pain, stiffness, decreased ROM and increasing difficulty performing required duties. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00358

Original file (PD-2014-00358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Costochondritis5099-500310%Chronic Costochondritis 6899-68170%20070425Other x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 420070425 Rating: 10%Combined: 20% * Derived from...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00154

Original file (PD-2014-00154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The chest/rib paincondition, characterized as “rib pain-chronic bilateral chest wall pain from costochondritis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chest wall/rib pain from costochondritis…”as unfitting, rated 10%with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02365

Original file (PD-2013-02365.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The Board unanimously agreed the record in evidence to reasonably supports the abdominal condition as unfitting.The Board then undertook rating consideration. The Board agreed that no rating could be recommended under this code. The minority member notes that the back condition was of such severity it was permanently profiled and considered “unfitting” for continuation of military service by the PEB.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00482

Original file (PD-2012-00482.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

The MEB identified and forwarded only the chronic chest wall pain condition for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The VASRD in effect at the time of separation utilized the subjective criteria of slight, for a 0% rating; moderate, for a 10% rating and moderately severe or severe for a 20% rating for rating purposes under code 5321. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02094

Original file (PD-2013-02094.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

A ROM evaluation was performed by physical therapy (PT) the following month, recording flexion of 15 degrees and exceedingly limited ROM in all planes;but, the therapist specified that the ROM limitations “could be part of the … brace that prevents him from using his back in the proper range.” The STR documents a cumulative 2 weeks of physician directed convalescent leave (separate 1-week periods soon after the injury), various entries confirming antalgic gait, none noting abnormal contour...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00526

Original file (PD2010-00526.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

RightRightFlexion (140⁰ normal)140⁰ with pain130⁰ x 3 with painExtension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰ x 3CommentsClicking and grating on exam with antalgic gait and use of off-loader brace; resting position 10⁰ of flexion; crepitus; strength 4/5 secondary to pain; no instabilityRight knee patellar compression and McMurray tests positive; motor strength normal (5/5)Rating10% (§4.59 painful motion)10% (§4.71a painful motion)On the MEB exam (29 October 2007) five and one-half months prior to separation the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00517

Original file (PD 2012 00517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

Pre-Separation) All Effective Date 20040319 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Left upper extremity lymphedema s/p radical mastectomy w/reconstruction after stage 3 breast cancer dx 7627-7199- 7121 20% Residuals of carcinoma of left breast w/Lymphedema LUE 7627- 7121 60%* 20040115 Left Radical Mastectomy 7626 50% 20040115 Asthma Not Unfitting Asthma 6602 30% 20040115 Abdominal and low back pain Not Unfitting Low Back Pain NSC 20040115 Bilateral upper extremity weakness Not...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01020

Original file (PD2013 01020.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The chest painand headache conditions, characterized as “chronic costochondritis” and “migraines with aura,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic costochondritis and migraine headaches”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%,referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for chronic costochondritis and DoDI 1332.39 for migraine headaches.The CI made no appealsand was...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00774

Original file (PD2011-00774.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

The PEB adjudicated the chronic left lung condition as unfitting, rated 10%, five years after being placed on TDRL, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The exams documented improving weight, negative serology titers for coccidiomycosis yet continued symptoms of dyspnea on exertion (DOE), chest pain and headaches. At the final TDRL MEB exam, the CI reported no improvement.

Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01104

Similar Decisions